Fixing healthcare – again

29 Nov

I am fixing this post based on insight from a Huffington Post poster who goes by ‘Stephen S’….

I’ve written about this before, but I’m caught in a great gust of hot air on one of the forums I frequent, so I’ll restate my position on healthcare.  It costs too much, and it needs to be fixed.  We are the only ones who can fix it, nobody can fix it for us.

Healthcare costs too much because Americans don’t have to pay the bill directly, and they don’t have to make cost/benefit judgments about their own healthcare.  This is similar to a “Tragedy of the Commons” situation, where there’s no downside for any individual grabbing as much as they can at everyone else’s expense.  When nearly everyone is doing that, you end up with the healthcare costs we have.

Fixing this is simple: present the bill to the consumer.  That is also impossible without some very substantial preparations beforehand.  I don’t have the entire 200 page bill written, your Congressperson has the staff to do that.  Here is the logical outline (a line diagram, if you will).

1.  Forbid third party payers, except (eliminate “perhaps”) for military personnel delivering healthcare to military servicemembers.  No person not a direct and close blood relative may pay anyone else’s medical bills.  This is necessary to achieve the objective of having Americans shop as thoughtfully and diligently for health care as they do for running shoes.

2.  Provide tax exempt and subsidized health care savings accounts.  Set a reasonable amount (obviously, somewhat less than the average health insurance premium is today) and insure that all Americans have that much set aside each year.  The wealthy get little gov’t help, perhaps a tax break, and then on a sliding scale the less well off get more and more help.  Until those at the bottom get a direct subsidy to insure their account is funded.

This account can only be used for healthcare, at the citizen’s discretion.  Families (based on Stephen S’s input, expand this to any concerned citizen, and provide for tax exempt, tax advantaged fund raisers when needed) can pool/share accounts as necessary.  Residual funds can be bequeathed (passed on) to heirs.  Any facility accepting payment from these accounts must meet certain standards, including a published list of representative fees.

3.  A national catastrophic/chronic insurance program to cover those expenses for individuals afflicted with these conditions.  This is true “insurance”, like auto liability or term life, where everyone pays in a small amount, but only those who are affected draw benefits.  No refusal for pre-existing conditions.  A panel of widely respected industry, government, and academic experts to develop the definition of these conditions and how insurance referrals would work.

Conclusion – and that’s it, that’s all it takes (unless there’s something I’m missing, but so far no one has pointed anything out [obviously Stephen S has contributed, my thanks to him]).  These measures, taken together, will provide a human, equitable, high quality, and affordable health care system for America.  A true single payer system that leverages comparison shopping and human judgment at the most granular level.

G’night all, and may God continue to bless America!

2 Responses to “Fixing healthcare – again”

  1. Joy February 8, 2011 at 1:41 am #

    Some of what you describe is being proposed in the state of Washington. People will insure themselves but the state will insure you when it goes over $10,000. They did a study and found that many people can handle up to $10,000 of medical expenses. But, bankruptcy threatens beyond $10,000. People will have the option of buying regular insurance for the $0 to $9,999 expenses. Our health care premium in a retired teachers’ group was $1531 a month for a mediocre policy. We moved to Washington where the state regulates insurance and saved $6000 the first year. We have better policies for less money. My husband has his with the state uninsured pool and I have Blue Cross. Nevada and some other states don’t have an uninsured pool. What will those people do that can’t get regular insurance? Wyoming’s uninsured pool would have been over $1800 for my husband who is 62. Not many could afford that.

    • captbecker February 9, 2011 at 8:42 am #


      Thank you for your comment. It’s posted and available for viewing now. The Washington plan you describe has elements that are very good.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: